Atisolve builds custom software, mobile applications and web platforms for businesses in Pune. We work remotely on Indian business hours, which means direct access to the developers on your project rather than a relationship conducted entirely through an account manager.
This page sets out what we build, how a remote engagement runs day to day, and what to verify about any development partner before you commit. Contact details are at the bottom.
Pune is one of the few Indian cities where manufacturing and software carry roughly equal weight. The automotive and engineering belt around Pimpri-Chinchwad and Chakan sits alongside a substantial IT services industry, and a great many businesses here have a foot in both — an engineering firm with an in-house software team, or a components manufacturer whose customers now expect digital traceability as a condition of supply.
Building software for that environment is genuinely different from building an office application, and the difference is not technical sophistication. It is that the system has to survive contact with a factory. Data gets entered by someone wearing gloves, on a shared terminal, under production pressure, at the end of a shift. If the interface demands care and attention, it will be filled in carelessly or not at all, and within a month you will have a system whose records nobody trusts.
So the design constraints invert. Fewer fields, larger targets, sensible defaults, and tolerance for being used out of order. It should be faster to record something correctly than to skip it. Where a reading comes from an instrument or a scanner, it should be captured automatically rather than retyped, because every manual transcription is an error waiting to happen and an operator's time being wasted.
The other reality is that shop-floor systems are judged against paper. Paper never goes down, never needs a login and never rejects an entry for failing validation. A digital system that is merely equivalent to paper will lose; it has to be visibly better at something the operator personally cares about, or adoption quietly fails while everyone reports that it is going fine.
Job cards, batch records, inspection results and rejection analysis, designed for entry under real conditions rather than for an office desk.
Internal systems built around how the operation actually runs — planning, approvals, maintenance schedules, documentation and the reporting layered on top.
Web platforms where suppliers confirm schedules and dealers place orders and track dispatch, replacing the email and telephone traffic your team currently absorbs.
Android and iOS apps with their backend, built as one system — field service, inspection capture and sales, with sensible offline behaviour where coverage is unreliable.
Joining ERP, accounting, machine data and logistics systems so a number is captured once and reconciles across everything downstream.
Replacing systems that still work but have become expensive to change, generally in stages so production continues throughout.
We also provide SEO, generative engine optimisation, digital marketing, UI/UX design and ongoing maintenance.
For manufacturing clients there is one adjustment worth stating up front: we will want to see the floor. Not as a formality — a walkthrough of how material and paperwork actually move usually contradicts the process description in some instructive way, and that contradiction is generally where the useful work is. We travel for that at the start of the engagement.
Conversations plus a walkthrough of the actual operation. We want to see the register being filled in, the terminal being used and the point where information gets lost between shifts. Unpaid.
Written breakdown of what will be built, sequenced and priced, with assumptions stated openly and uncertainty flagged rather than padded.
Working software every two weeks, starting with the most painful area. Getting a real version in front of operators early changes the design far more usefully than any review meeting.
For shop-floor systems we pilot on a single line or cell before rolling out. It contains the disruption and surfaces the practical problems — the terminal in the wrong place, the field nobody can fill in with gloves on — while they are still cheap to fix.
Staged rollout with training for operators and supervisors, and a period of close monitoring. Shift handover is where these systems most often break, so we watch it specifically.
A maintenance retainer or a documented handover to your own team. Both are legitimate and we do not price the handover option punitively.
A shared channel with the developers on it rather than a ticket queue, and written weekly summaries whether the news is good or not. Same time zone, so questions get resolved the same day. Where your operation runs multiple shifts we will agree in advance who to contact when something breaks at 11pm, rather than improvising it the first time it happens.
Tier 1 and Tier 2 suppliers needing traceability, quality records and schedule visibility that satisfy what their customers now demand as a condition of supply.
Project-based manufacturers tracking work orders, sub-assemblies, site installation and warranty across long delivery cycles.
Product firms needing a first version built quickly, or an internal system their core engineering team cannot be spared for.
Institutions and training providers handling admissions, attendance, assessment and fees across systems that do not interoperate.
Fleet, warehouse and dispatch operations where planning still happens on a whiteboard and a phone.
Hospitals and diagnostic chains joining up records, appointments and reporting across multiple locations.
A large share of software projects in Pune's engineering belt do not begin as internal initiatives. They begin because a customer — usually a much larger OEM — has issued a requirement. Barcode traceability on every part. Advance shipping notices in a specified format. Quality data submitted through their portal on their schedule. Compliance is no longer optional; it is a condition of continuing to supply.
These projects have a distinctive shape. The deadline is external and immovable, the specification belongs to somebody who will not negotiate it with you, and the penalty for missing it is commercial rather than merely inconvenient. What they need is not an ambitious system but a narrow one delivered on time, built so that the parts your customer mandated are exactly right and everything else stays deliberately simple. We have seen firms turn a mandated traceability requirement into an eighteen-month plant-wide programme and then miss the original deadline. Meet the obligation first, then extend the system afterwards if it proves worth extending.
We do not do industrial control — PLC programming, SCADA or anything that directly actuates machinery. That is a different discipline with different safety obligations and you should engage a specialist. We work at the layer above: capturing, reconciling and reporting on what the plant produces. If you need thirty developers next quarter, or daily physical presence, we are also not the right answer.
We quote per project rather than publishing rates. Estimates state their assumptions so you can challenge the reasoning rather than only the total.
Begin with a conversation. Call +91 91082 92463 or email atisolve@gmail.com. You can also see the full range of services, read how we work, or browse our writing on software delivery.
No. We are remote-first and serve clients across India. We work Indian business hours and we do travel to Pune — for manufacturing projects a site visit is not optional, so plan on us being there at the start of the engagement and at rollout. If you need a partner with a permanent local office, we are not it.
Usually, though what is possible depends on what your ERP exposes. Modern systems with documented APIs are straightforward. Older or heavily customised installations sometimes require database views, scheduled file exchanges or an intermediate staging layer, which is slower and more fragile. We establish what is genuinely available during discovery rather than assuming and finding out mid-build.
Sometimes, and it depends entirely on the equipment. Machines that already expose data over a network or write to a file are workable. Older equipment with no digital output would need additional instrumentation, which is a separate project with its own specialist supplier. We will tell you honestly which category your machines fall into rather than promising integration and discovering the constraint later.
This is the question that decides whether the project succeeds, and it is a design problem rather than a training one. Systems fail on the floor when recording something correctly takes longer than the old method. We design for gloved hands, shared terminals and interrupted work, we support local language where that helps, and we watch real operators use it during the pilot rather than assuming it works because it works for us.
There is no useful single number, and anyone quoting one before seeing your operation is guessing. Manufacturing projects in particular vary with how much integration and instrumentation is involved. Our estimates itemise assumptions so you can see what is driving the figure.
You do, entirely, written into the contract — source, deployment configuration and documentation. Wherever possible we deploy into your own cloud account so the infrastructure is yours too.
We agree this before launch rather than during the first incident: what the response time is, who is contactable outside office hours, and — importantly — what the fallback procedure is so production is not stopped by a software fault. Any shop-floor system needs a documented way to keep working on paper temporarily and reconcile afterwards. A partner who has not thought about that has not built for a factory.
Yes, and in Pune it is common, since many engineering firms have one. We agree the boundary and review process up front. Frequently the arrangement is that we build and they operate, which works well provided the handover is planned from the beginning rather than improvised at the end.
Yes, routinely and usually before detailed discussion. Where your customers impose confidentiality obligations on you that flow down to suppliers, tell us early so we can confirm we can meet them.
Call +91 91082 92463 or email atisolve@gmail.com describing the problem. We will suggest a discovery conversation and, for manufacturing work, a site visit — both free and without obligation. If we are not the right partner we will say so.
Whether it’s an app, website, or platform—your idea deserves expert execution. Let us help you build it from the ground up with clarity, care, and speed.